Teaching with Instructional Technology

Wednesday, September 27, 2006

Fall Semester Schedule


Week 4: Understanding and Using Courseware (WebCT, Moodle....)

Week 5: Creating Websites with Dreamweaver



Week 6: Presentation Technologies & Technology Equipment available for Check-Out

Week 7: Making and Using Video Clips in Class

Week 8: Teaching (and Grading) Composition with Audacity

Week 9: Creating Websites with CSS

Week 10: Panel Presentation: Research on Teaching and Technology

Week 11: TBA

Thanksgiving Break

Week 12: Experiential Learning with Technology

Week 13: Video Gaming, Literacy & Pedagogy

Week 14: No TWIT

Friday, September 22, 2006

Ethics/Intellectual Property Links

Some of the materials provided here revolve around what the CCCC has to say about research with students, ethics, and intellectual property.

However, there are many people in our department who are not strictly compositionists--people who work in technical communication, modern languages, philosophy, speech communication, education, and so on. Therefore, I hope to add to this list of links as I learn more beyond my own specialization.

Michigan Tech's Vice President for Research.
This is where you go to apply to the IRB for approval of your study. I (Karen) went through this process with my dissertation and would be happy to share my materials. In addition, Ted Lockhart is listed as a Review Board member, so he would be a good person to talk with about IRB.

CCCC Position Statements
This webpage has links to :

  • CCCC Guidelines for the Ethical Conduct of Research in Composition Studies

  • CCCC Ethical Conduct of Research Involving Human Participants: A Bibliography

  • Guidelines for the Ethical Treatment of Students and Student Writing in Composition Studies (for those of you at the TWIT, this is the handout I gave you.)


CCCC Committee on Intellectual Property

Copyright and Fair Use website from Stanford University

Sunday, September 17, 2006

Podcasting with Casey--a new way to do oral rhetoric

September 15, 2006
People in Attendance: Casey, Randy H., Jim O., Karen S., Heather, Ethan, Diane, Jnan, Laurance, Vicky

MEETING NOTES

Casey shared some of her success with podcasting in a summer Revisions course, as well as some of the challenges she negotiated. Her course materials, including podcasting assignment sheets and resources, can be found on her website.

For those who are unfamiliar with the term, podcasting is basically this:

You make a sound file, and upload it to a website so that other people can hear it. Over time you keep updating your sound files and other people set up an "RSS feed" so that they always hear your latest sound-work. (RSS stands for real simple syndication.) You can imagine how this works with sites like NPR

Casey did a variation on this, where the students created sound files aimed at persuading different audiences to attend MTU, and then the students housed the sound files on blogs they had set up with Blogger. It's noteworthy that some of the people in MTU's marketing division are interested in the idea of podcasts as recruitment material.

The students mostly recorded their voices using mikes built into the computers, and then edited the sound with Audacity, which unlike Garage Band is free and works on both Macs and PCs. Some students conducted interviews for the project, and some students used music, which Casey required to be copy-right free, errr Creative Commons liscensed. (What's the difference? Stay tuned for our Intellectual Property TWIT.)

Casey noted that this project generated a lot of buy-in from the students. For example, one student is thinking of using podcasts for his Enterprise program, to keep people updated and recruit sponsors.

And as the one writing this post, I just want to ask:
Really, aren't we sick of filling a couple weeks of Revisions with required speeches? Who isn't bored by the end of all that? Couldn't we benefit from a new way to teach oral rhetoric?

Big thanks to Casey for sharing and being so creative in her teaching. Heather is doing podcasting this term too, so she is another person to talk with.

There is obviously a lot more to say. For example, the issue of grading came up in our Q&A following Casey's presentation, as did a question about how to use podcasting to make the rhetorical issues of voice, audience, and generic convention more concrete for students. We will definitely keep talking about podcasting this year. Thanks.

Monday, September 11, 2006

Ideas 4 Future TWITs

September 8, 2006
People in Attendance: Jim O., Diane, Vicky, Heather, Ethan, Randy H., Karen



MEETING NOTES

We're thinking about having 2 TWITs on Cascading Style Sheets. CSS is an important web design thing, kind of like HTML but different. One session on the what/why of CSS, and one session that is hands-on, here's how you do it.

We might spend 2 weeks on Podcasting . Podcasting is a way to use computer technology to do oral rhetoric, which could be very useful for Revisions teachers among others. One session would be on plain vanilla podcasting with students, the other would be on iTunes U, a faculty-centric use of podcasting to deliver lectures over the web. Jim might bring in MTU's Patty Linz (sp?) to talk about this, since Tech is in the process of implementing iTunes U.

Later in the year, if we get comfortable with podcasting, we could podcast a TWIT, and then discuss what that practice got us, what was left out, what we might do differently next time, etc.

We could spend 2 weeks on Courseware, including WebCT, Moveable Type (a blogging application), Moodle (which is open source), and some different kinds of grading software.

A TWIT on Dreamweaver could be helpful.

We would like to get together a panel presentation. The papers presented would not necessarilly have to be on teaching with technology specifically, but the conversation that ensues would apply the content of the papers to TWIT issues. This could serve as practice for conferences, and it could create motivation for people to apply to the Computers & Writing Conference to be held in Detroit this spring.

People also expressed an interest in a session on how to use technology effectively in presentations. Comparing a few presentations and doing some meta-analysis might be a good way to address this interest.

We might have a TWIT on using film clips in class. How do you cut out just a minute of a movie to show?

Finally, we could also have a TWIT showing what you can do with Walker's wireless connection.



Please use the comment function below to add to this summary, raise questions, or make suggestions.

Thanks. Karen